Same Tool, Different Impact: The Two Faces of Digital Management in Remote Teams
Digital tools are neither good nor bad. But the way managers use them can make or break a remote team’s well-being.
The shift to remote and hybrid work has put digital communication at the centre of daily management. Emails, messages, video calls — they’re the new office corridors, the new open doors. And just like in a physical office, what a manager does in these spaces matters enormously. The difference is that in digital environments, the line between being supportive and being intrusive has become dangerously thin.
The bright side: presence that empowers
When managers communicate clearly through digital channels, provide prompt feedback, choose the right tool for the right situation, and remain available for genuine emergencies, something powerful happens. A study conducted at the University of Bologna and led by Dr. Cioffi showed that employees who experience this kind of supportive digital leadership report greater clarity in their roles and a stronger sense of being backed by their supervisor (Cioffi, Balducci & Toderi, 2025). It’s the digital equivalent of a manager whose door is always open: approachable, responsive, and organised. This echoes broader evidence that effective digital communication and a feedback-rich culture are among the strongest predictors of remote workers’ well-being (Wang et al., 2021; Poulsen & Ipsen, 2017).
The dark side: connection that controls
Now flip the coin. The same tools that enable support can also become instruments of pressure. Late-night emails with work requests. Unexpected calls during sick leave or holidays. Constant “are you there?” check-ins that signal distrust rather than care. A recent systematic review confirmed that these over-monitoring and boundary-violating behaviours are directly linked to increased stress due to technology in employees (Rademaker et al., 2023). Also called “technostress”, it is a condition of physical and mental distress, recognized as an occupational disease since 2007, caused by excessive or improper use of digital technologies (ICT). Consistently, when managers avoided these abusive digital practices, their teams reported more autonomy and lower workload pressure (Cioffi et al., 2025). In other words, sometimes the most effective thing a manager can do digitally is… nothing.
What HR can do about it
The good news is that these aren’t personality traits — they’re competencies, and competencies can be developed. A recent study (Cioffi et al., 2025) produced a validated 9-item tool (the DMCIT) that organisations can use as a self-reflection exercise for managers or as upward feedback from teams. A quick, evidence-based way to spot blind spots and turn digital habits into healthier ones.
Because in the end, the question isn’t whether your organisation uses digital tools. It’s whether your managers use them to lift people up — or wear them down.
References
Cioffi, G., Balducci, C., & Toderi, S. (2025). Digital Stress-Preventive Management Competencies: Definition, Identification and Tool Development for Research and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020267
Poulsen, S., & Ipsen, C. (2017). In times of change: How distance managers can ensure employees’ wellbeing and organizational performance. Safety Science, 100, 37–45.
Rademaker, T., Klingenberg, I., & Süß, S. (2023). Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly.Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59.
